- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 June 2026
- Bench
- S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP Crl.(MD) 3132/2026
Judgment
ORDER Seeking to direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's Sangam, namely Sangili Karuppan Thaneer Parai Kaludaikkum Magalir Nala Sangam, its office bearers, women members, employees, vehicles, machinery and properties to enable them to peacefully and lawfully carry on quarrying operations in Survey No.1372/1(Part-6) to an extent of 2.50.0 Hectare situated at Kamayagoundanpatti Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District pursuant to the permission granted by the competent authorities, by considering the petitioner's representation dated
05.06.2026 and consequently restrain respondents 3 to 8 and their men, agents, supporters and associates from unlawfully interfering with the quarrying operations and threatening the members of the petitioner's Sangam, this writ petition, this writ petition is filed.
¶2Since no adverse order is passed against the private respondents, notice to the private respondents is dispensed with.
¶3The petitioner represents a self help group which was established with the noble objective of women empowerment. The members of the petitioner Sangam has been entrusted with the right of quarrying by the district authorities and the Sangam has obtained proper quarrying license with respect to the land in Survey No. 1372 / 1 (Part-6) to an extent of 2.50.0 Hectares situated at Kamayagoundanpatti Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. While the quarrying operations were undertaken by the collective efforts of the self help group women, the respondents, 3 to 8 have interfered with the peaceful conduct of the quarry and are seeking commission for the petitioner Sangam to continue their work. Hence, the petitioner has made a representation before the respondent police. Since no action has bene taken, the petitioner is before this Court.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the matter will be looked into.
¶5Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.
¶6In view of the above, the 2nd respondent police is directed to issue CSR, put the petitioner as well as the respondents 3 to 8 on notice under Section 64 BNSS and after giving an opportunity of hearing to both the parties, conclude the enquiry within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
¶7With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.
12.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No gbg Note : Issue order copy on 16.06.2026. TO:-
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.
2.The Inspector of Police, Royappanpatti Police Station, Theni District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. gbg Dated
12.06.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Sangili Karuppan Thanneer Parai Kaludaikkum Magalir Nala Sangam, Rep. by its President A.Rubini ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni. 2.The Inspector of Police, Royappanpatti Police Station, Theni District. 3.Rajangam 4.Sobiya 5.Rajendran 6.Mokkai 7.Neelavathi 8.Kumaresan ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing Respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate and effective police protection to the petitioner's Sangan namely Sangili Karuppan Thaneer Parai Kaludaikkum Magalir Nala Sangam, its office bearers, women members, employees, vehicles, machinery and properties to enable them to peacefully and lawfully carry on quarrying operations in Survey No.1372/1(Part-6) to an extent of 2.50.0 Hectare situated at Kamayagoundanpatti Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District pursuant to the permission granted by the competent authorities, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 05.06.2026 and consequently restrain respondents 3 to 8 and their men, agents, supporters and associates from unlawfully interfering with the quarrying operations and threatening the members of the petitioner's Sangam within time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : MrJ.Pooventherarajan For R1 & R2 : Mr.C.Susikumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.