Stephano Jonathan.J v. The Superintendent of Police

O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infrucutous. No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

14.07.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No tta To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. tta Dated : 21.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.07.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR and W.M.P(MD).No.14650 of 2021 J.Stephano Jonathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ramanathapuram. 3.P.Diviya ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from interfering in the civil matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent pertaining to the matrimonial dispute subject matter of the petition for restitution of conjugal rights in I.D.O.P.No.131 of 2021 and the maintenance case in M.C.No.98 of 2020 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor For R3 : Mr.M.Maran for R3