- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 June 2026
- Bench
- P.Vadamalai
- Case no.
- CMP(MD) 7118/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.Vadamalai
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17-06-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI IN SA(MD) NO. 568 OF 2012 P.John Thomas (Died)
1.Glory
2.Josephinrajam (Died)
3.Lilli Michael Rani
4.Sahaya Jeyanthi
5.Mary Daisy
6.Thangadurai
7.T.Ramya
8.T.Udhaya Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs
1.Ramasamy Mooppanar
2.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Palayamkottai, Rep. by its Superintending Engineer.
3.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Courtralam, Rep. by its Junior Engineer (Village). Murugaiah (Died)
4.Ramakrishnan @ Chellappa
5.Arumugam
6.Thirumalaikumar Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions : Mr.D.Srinivasaragavan, Advocate For Respondent(s) in all petitions : Mr.R.Manimaran, Advocate for R1 Mr.B.Ramanathan, Standing Counsel for R3 M/s.Lakshmi Gopinathan for M/s.Polex Legal Solutions for R4 R2, R5, & R6 – No Appearance Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, Order XXII Rule 9, and Order XXII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to condone the delay of 645 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement of the above Second Appeal caused due to the death of the sole Appellant and due to the death of his daughter, to set aside the abatement of the above Second Appeal caused due to the death of the sole Appellant and due to the death of his daughter, and to bring on record petitioners 1 to 5 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant, namely P.John Thomas, and rank them as appellants 2 to 6 in S.A.(MD)No.568 of 2012, and to bring on record petitioners 6 to 8 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased daughter of the sole appellant, namely Josephinrajam, and rank them as appellants 7 to 9 in S.A.(MD)No.568 of 2012 on the file of this Court. COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 645 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement of the above Second Appeal caused due to the death of the sole Appellant's daughter, to set aside the abatement of the above Second Appeal caused due to the death of the sole Appellant's daughter, and to bring on record petitioners 6 to 8 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased daughter of the sole appellant, namely Josephinrajam, and rank them as appellants 7 to 9 in S.A.(MD)No.568 of 2012 on the file of this Court.
¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions.
¶3There is no representation for the 2nd respondent.
¶4The names of respondents 5 & 6 have been printed in the cause list.
¶5The learned counsel for the 1st respondent, the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent, and the learned counsel for the 4th respondent have not raised any serious objections to these petitions.
¶6Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. 17-06-2026 (2/2) Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum. mkn CMP(MD)oNOS.o7118,o7119,o&o7122oofo2026 P.VADAMALAI,oJ. mkn CMP(MD)oNOS.o7118,o7119,o&o7122oofo2026 IN SA(MD)oNO.o568oOFo2012o
17.06.2026 (2/2)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.