VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Chinnaiya.K v. The District Collector

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 July 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16930/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, with a grievance that his representation, dated

11.01.2023, seeking for surveying his land, has not been considered by the respondents, has filed this writ petition.

¶2Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents, submits that the concerned surveyor was on training and they would complete the survey within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶3Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

14.07.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector, The District Collector Office, Trichy District.

¶2The Tahsildar, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District.

¶3The Taluk Surveyor, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

14.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI K.Chinnaiya ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, The District Collector Office, Trichy District. 2. The Tahsildar, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District. 3. Taluk Surveyor, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents especially 3rd respondent to survey the land in Survey No. 7/3 measuring 0.26.50 ares in Sevalpatti Village, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District and fix the four boundary by considering the petitioner's application vide payment challan dated 11.01.2023 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.