VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

B.Ramkumar Adityan v. The Additional Chief Secretary

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 March 2026
Bench
N. Sathish Kumar, M.Jothiraman
Case no.
WP(MD) 18255/2019

Follow Madras High CourtFollow N. Sathish KumarFollow M.Jothiraman

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 4, 7, and 8 to abandon the construction of a dividing wall or any other construction activity in the Nangamozhi Regulator in Sadayaneri Channel at Nangaimozhi Village, Udangudi Panchayat Union, Tiruchendur Taluk, and consequently to direct the sixth respondent to clean and restore the Sadayaneri Channel, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 7 and 9, on instructions, submitted that the proposed construction of the dividing wall in the channel had already been dropped at the initial stage and that no construction activity is presently taking place. It was further submitted that water is being supplied through the existing channel and, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition.

3.Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [N.S.K.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.]

04.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009.

3.The Director, Directorate of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Panagal Building, Chennai – 600 015.

4.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Korampallam, Thoothukudi – 628 101.

5.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Korampallam, Thoothukudi – 628 101.

6.The Executive Engineer, Tamirabarani Irrigation System Division, PWD (Behind SP Office), Palayamkottai – 627 002.

7.The Assistant Director (Panchayat), Thoothukudi District, O/o.The Collectorate Complex, Korampallam, Thoothukudi – 628 101.

8.The Block Development Officer, O/o.Udangudi Panchayat Union, Udangudi – 628 203.

9.The District Environment Engineer, Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Thoothukudi – 628 008. W.P(MD)No.18255eofe2019 oN.SATHISHoKUMARoo,oJo. and oM.JOTHIRAMANoo,oJo. ps ORDERoMADEoIN W.P(MD)No.18255oofo2019 DATEDo:o04.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and W.M.P(MD)No.14698 of 2019 B.Ramkumar Adityan ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009. 3.The Director, Directorate of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Panagal Building, Chennai – 600 015. 4.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Korampallam, Thoothukudi – 628 101. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Korampallam, Thoothukudi – 628 101. 6.The Executive Engineer, Tamirabarani Irrigation System Division, PWD (Behind SP Office), Palayamkottai – 627 002. 7.The Assistant Director (Panchayat), Thoothukudi District, O/o.The Collectorate Complex, Korampallam, Thoothukudi – 628 101. 8.The Block Development Officer, O/o.Udangudi Panchayat Union, Udangudi – 628 203. 9.The District Environment Engineer, Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Thoothukudi – 628 008. 10.V.Edwin Kamaraj ... Respondents (R – 10 is suo Motu impleaded vide order dated 22.08.2019 made in W.P(MD)No.18255 of 2019) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 4, 7 and 8 to abandon the construction of dividing wall or any other construction activities in the Nangamozhi Regulator in Sadayaneri Channel in Nangaimozhi village in Udangudi Panchayat Union, Tiruchendur Taluk and subsequently direct the respondent No.6 to clean and restore Sadayaneri Channel pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan (R1 to R.7 & R.9) Special Government Pleader : Ms.Madhuri Donti Reddy (R9) Standing Counsel : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh (R.10)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.