- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1425/2023
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, with a grievance that the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.21829 of 2019 dated 22.12.2021 has not been complied, has filed this contempt petition.
2.When the matter came up for hearing today, learned Additional Advocate General, on instructions, submitted that enquiry has now been concluded and that the final orders would be passed within a period of four weeks.
3.Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Additional Advocate General, this contempt petition is closed. Index :
03.11.2023 NCC : gk To
1.The District Collector, O/o.District Collector, Dindigul.
2.The Sub Collector / Enquiry Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk
03.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI K.Sankarasekaran ... Petitioner v. 1.M.N.Poongodi, District Collector, O/o.District Collector, Dindigul. 2.S.Sivakumar, Enquiry Officer / Sub Collector, Palani, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents / contemnor for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dated 22.12.2021 passed in WP(MD)No.21829 of 2019. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondents : Mr.Veera Kathiravan, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.