VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Vairamuthu v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 June 2026
Bench
P.Dhanabalauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 11209/2026

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 16/06/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Vairamuthu ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur Police Station, Tenkasi District. Crime No.196/2026. ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.196/2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Ramachandhran S R A, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side) ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 24(1) of COTPA Act, 2023 (Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003), and 123 of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.196 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on secret information, the respondent police went to the place of occurrence and found that the accused were in illegal possession of 1300 kg of banned tobacco products. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has no way connected in the above said incident. He would further submit that the entire contraband was recovered from A1 and A1 was already arrested and released on bail. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side) would submit that the accused were in illegal possession of 1300 kg of banned tobacco products and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He would further submit that the co-accused was arrested and released on bail and the petitioner has 1 previous case similar in nature.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and the quantity of tobacco product involved in this case and based on the confession statement made by the co-accused, the petitioner herein was arrayed as an accused and the entire contraband was recovered from the co-accused and the co-accused was already arrested and released on bail and though the petitioner has 1 previous case, in that case, he was released on bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of 30 days, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

16.06.2026 dss

To

1.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur Police Station, Tenkasi District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. CRLoOP(MD).oNo.11209oofo2026 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooP.oDHANABAL,J oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooodss oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN oooooooooooooooooooooooooCRLoOP(MD)oNo.11209oofo2026 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:o16/06/2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.