VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

E.Kavitha, W/O.Elangovan v. Babu Rep. by His P/A

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 April 2023
Bench
P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 184/2018

Judgment

ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order passed by the Rent Controller/District Munsif, Thanjavur in E.A.No.29 of 2017 in E.P.No.29 of 2016 in R.C.O.P.No.31 of 2013, dated 11.08.2017.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner reported ''no instruction'' and he also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the property has already been delivered. Hence, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous.

¶4Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

03.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No vsd To

1.The District Munsif, Thanjavur.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

P.VADAMALAI, J. vsd

and C.M.P(MD)No.819 of 2018

03.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and C.M.P(MD)No.819 of 2018 E.Kavitha ... Revision Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. Babu ... Respondent/Respondent PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed by the Rent Controller/District Munsif, Thanjavur in E.A.No.29 of 2017 in E.P.No.29 of 2016 in R.C.O.P.No.31 of 2013, dated 11.08.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramasamy For Respondent : Mr.G.Mohankumar

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.