Marry Goldwin Hemalatha v. Maria Arul Dhas, (Died)

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is called absent. However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 & 8 submits that this civil revision petition has become infructuous, in view of the fact that the suit has already been disposed of.

¶2Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 & 8, this civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

30.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sm TO:-

1.The Subordinate Judge, Pdamanabhapuram.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

P.B. BALAJI, J. sm C.R.P.(MD)No.211 of 2018 Dated:

30.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI C.R.P.(MD)No.211 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD)No.915 of 2018 Mary Goldwin Hemalatha ...Petitioner /Vs./ Maria Arul Dhas (Died), 1.Alphonsa 2.M.Ajidhas 3.M.Anju 4.M.Ajith 5.Maria Thankamma 6.Lucas 7.Maria Rajan 8.Sobhanadhas 9.Mary 10.Stella Rubi 11.Arul Mary Stella 12.Jenis 13.Jerin 14.Joshi . ...Respondents PRAYER:- Petition - filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 10.08.2017 made in I.A.No.3 of 2009 in O.S.No.103 of 2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Pdamanabhapuram, and allow this civil revision petition. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.M.Balamohan Thambi (R1 to R4 & R8) No appearance (R5 to R7 & R9 to R14)