- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 June 2023
- Bench
- P.Vadamalai
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 655/2018
Judgment
ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner is present. There is no representation for the respondent. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner submitted a Memo stating that the appeal in A.S.No.42 of 2017 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai itself was dismissed on 28.01.2019 and as such this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. The said memo is recorded.
¶2In view of the same, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.
05.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No BTR To
1.The II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
P.VADAMALAI, J. BTR
05.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and C.M.P(MD)No.2855 of 2018 R.Vasudevan ... Petitioner / Respondent / Respondent Vs. Sabari Ramalingam ... Respondent/ Petitioner / Appellant PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.01.2018 made in I.A.No.667 of 2017 in A.S.No.42 of 2017 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Thiagarajan For Respondent : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.