- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 April 2023
- Bench
- P.Vadamalai
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 672/2018
Judgment
ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set-aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.44 of 2012 in R.C.O.P.No.12 of 2012 by the Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif) Dindigul dated
19.01.2018.
2.The learned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that the prayer sought for by the petitioner has become infructuous. He had also made an endorsement to that effect.
3.Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
19.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No vsd To
1.The Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Dindigul,
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
P.VADAMALAI, J. vsd
and C.M.P(MD)No.2930 of 2018
19.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and C.M.P(MD)No.2930 of 2018 T.Basker ... Petitioner Vs. Selvamani ...Respondent PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.44 of 2012 in R.C.O.P.No.12 of 2012 by the Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif) Dindigul, dated 19.01.2018 and set aside the same by allowing this Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.