- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 October 2023
- Bench
- K.K. Ramakrishnan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 15684/2020
Judgment
ORDER This Petition is filed seeking quashment of Cr.No.1740 of 2020 dated
19.10.2020 on the file of the respondent police.
¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State on instructions, submitted that on the complaint, investigation was conducted. After completion of investigation, final report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.215 of 2023. Hence, the petition has become infructuous.
¶3Upon perusal of FIR, it is clear that there is allegation that the accused entrusted the repairing work in the electricity pole without providing adequate safeguard to the deceased husband of the complainant. Hence, in view of the specific allegation, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition.
¶4Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all points before the trial Court. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
11.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No dss To
1.The Inspector of Police, Othakkadai Police Station, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. dss Crl.O.P(MD).No.15684 of 2020 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.7685 of 2020
11.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 11.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P(MD).No.15684 of 2020 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.7685 of 2020 Palsamy ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs. 1. The Inspector of Police, Othakkadai Police Station, Madurai District, Madurai. Cr.No.1740 of 2020 ... Respondent/Complainant 2. Santhammal ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records in Cr.No.1740 of 2020 dated 19.10.2020 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivaprakash For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for R1 : No appearance for R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.