VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muthumani v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 July 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 13007/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Muthumani ... Petitioner / Accused Rank not known Vs State rep by its The Inspector of Police, Jaihindpuram Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.219 of 2023.) ... Respondent / Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.JANSIRANI, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.Manikandan,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.219 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/ accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 147,148,294(b),324 of IPC and section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.219 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner came to the shop of the defacto complainant and threatened the defacto complainant showing knife and broken the showcase glass by arual and also assaulted him with empty bottle. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this the second anticipatory bail petition, earlier anticipatory bail Petition filed by the petitioner in Crl.OP(MD)No.11378 of 2023 was dismissed by this Court, on the ground that the petitioner is having four previous cases. He further submitted that this second anticipatory bail petition was filed mainly on the ground that the petitioner's name was not found in the FIR and based upon the confession statement of the co-accused, the petitioner's name was included in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that without any valid ground, the present petition has been filed by the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner along with some other persons regularly involved this kind of activities in the near by areas.

¶5Considering the fact that there is no change of circumstances and this Court do not find any reason to entertain this petition. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/-

18/07/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/08/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. TTA To

1.The Inspector of Police, Jaihindpuram Police Station, Madurai District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13007 of 2023 Date :18/07/2023 ED/VR /SAR- (24/08/2023) 3P / 3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.