VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Azhagesan v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 July 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 12872/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 14.07.2023 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

1.Azhagesan,

2.Azhaguselvam,

3.Ramasamy, ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Namanasamuthiram Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (Crime No.59 of 2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For petitionerss : Mr.D.Rameshkumar

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.Manikandan

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail Crime No.59 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitionerss/1 to 3 Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 I.P.C r/w Sections 21(1) and 21(2) of Tamil Nadu Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.59 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have illegally transported 3 units of gravel sand by using tipper lorry. Therefore, the present case came to be registered.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioners have transported 3 units of gravel sand illegally by using tipper lorry. He further submitted that the first and third petitioners are having one previous case, which is not similar in nature and the second petitioners is having no previous case at his credit.

¶5Considering the nature of the mineral involved, the first and third petitioners are having previous case, which is not in similar nature and the second petitioners is having no previous case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶7The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

14/07/2023 / TRUE COPY / /07/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. INDU TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI. DO THROUGH: THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAMANASAMUTHIRAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN Date :14/07/2023 PKP/DD/SAR- /25.07.2023/ 4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.