- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 October 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 15156/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records of the summon, dated 04.07.2023, issued by the 2nd respondent on the petitioner in C.No.G5/4851879/1560/2023 and Quash the same as illegal as against the petitioner.
¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by one Vijayan against the petitioner, enquiry was undertaken in C.No.262 of 2023. During the course of enquiry, both sides appeared. In the complaint also, he has given a statement that he will workout his remedy through revenue officials and also the District Registrar. On the basis of the above said statement, further action was dropped.
¶3In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this matter. Hence, this matter has become infructuous.
¶4With the above said, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
05.10.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : Indu TO
1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
Indu Dated: 05.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.10.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P(MD) No.11999 of 2023 V.Thangamani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. ...Respondents / Respondents 3.N.Vijayan ...Respondent / Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records of the summon, dated 04.07.2023, issued by the 2nd respondent on the petitioner in C.No.G5/4851879/1560/2023 and Quash the same as illegal as against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Suresh For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side).
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.