Jayakumar v. The District Registrar

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The only request made by the petitioner is that the petition mentioned proceedings should be entered in the encumbrance register and the second respondent must act in compliance with the impugned proceedings. So long as the order dated 20.12.2022 has not been stayed or set aside in the manner known to law, the second respondent is bound to act in consonance with the same.

¶3The Writ Petition is allowed. No costs.

23.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Registrar, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Sub Registrar, Pudukkottai, Thoothukudi District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

23.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Jayakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Sub Registrar, Pudukkottai, Thoothukudi District. (R2 is amended vide order dated 13.12.2023 in W.M.P.(MD)No.25184 of 2023) ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent herein to implement the order of the 1st respondent in Moo.Mu. No. 908/A4/2022 dated 20.12.2022 on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2023 and 27.06.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate