VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Alagumalai v. The Regional Manager

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 July 2023
Bench
S.S. Sundarauthor, D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Case no.
WP(MD) 17095/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.] This writ petition is filed challenging the possession notice, dated

18.05.2023, issued by the respondent – Bank under Section 13(4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

¶2The petitioner has an effective alternative remedy of approaching the Debts Recovery Tribunal by way of an appeal as against the impugned possession notice. This Court and the Honourable Supreme Court has repeatedly held that writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable, when the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy to workout his remedy. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[S.S.S.R., J.] [D.B.C., J.]

17.07.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk S.S.SUNDAR , J . and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) No.14313 of 2023

17.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.(MD) No.14313 of 2023 Alagumalai ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Regional Manager Canara Bank, Thoothukudi Thoothukudi District 2.The Authorised Officer Canara Bank Srivilliputhur Branch RC Church Compound Sattur Road, Srivilliputhur Virudhunagar District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari to call for records relate to the impugned possession notice dated 18.05.2023, issued by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Indrachithu

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.