VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ramasamy M.P v. The District Collector

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 June 2026
Bench
N. Sathish Kumar, P.B. Balajiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16815/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow N. Sathish KumarFollow P.B. Balaji

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to conduct a proper enquiry into the alleged irregular allotment of lands comprised in Survey Nos. 87/1A1, 87/1B2, 87/1A3, 87/1C, 88/1A, 89/1A, 89/1B, and 89/2 situated at Thumbala Village, Musiri Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, to ineligible persons claiming to be landless poor, and consequently to demarcate the plots and issue pattas to all eligible beneficiaries by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2026.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.S.Parthiban, learned counsel for State appearing for the respondents.

¶3The main grievance of the petitioner is that the lands were assigned in the year 2002 with the objective of providing house sites to landless poor persons. According to the petitioner, certain ineligible persons were irregularly allotted lands in the said assignment, and therefore an enquiry is sought into the alleged irregularities.

¶4We are of the view that the petitioner has no locus standi to maintain the present writ petition. The allotments were made in the year 2002, and none of the beneficiaries has challenged them. After the lapse of more than two decades, the petitioner cannot, as a matter of right, seek cancellation of the free house-site allotments made to landless poor persons pursuant to a Government policy. Further, no complaint regarding any alleged irregularity in the allotments had been raised for all these years. In such circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to challenge the allotments.

¶5Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. [N.S.K.,J.] [P.B.B.,J.]

18.06.2026

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes am To

1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Collectorate, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The District Adi Dravidar and Tribunal Welfare Officer, District Collectorate Campus, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Special Tahsildar (Adi Dravidar Welfare), Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District.

4.The Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. W.P(MD)No.16815eofe2026 oN.SATHISHoKUMARoo,oJo. and P.B.BALAJI,J. am ORDERoMADEoIN W.P(MD)No.16815oofo2026 DATEDo:o18.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI M.P.Ramasamy ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Collectorate, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The District Adi Dravidar and Tribunal Welfare Officer, District Collectorate Campus, Tiruchirappalli. 3.The Special Tahsildar (Adi Dravidar Welfare), Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 4.The Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to cancel the irregular allotment made to the ineligible landless poor people being the Survey Nos.87/1A1, 87/1B2, 87/1A3, 87/1C, 88/1A, 89/1A, 89/1B and 89/2 at Thumbala Village, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District by conducting proper enquiry and consequently to issue patta to all beneficiaries after demarcating the plots by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Parthiban Counsel for State

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.