VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Venish.S v. The Secretary

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 July 2023
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 17180/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to fix the minimum marks for differently abled persons against the selection of Assistant Surgeon (General) as per the Notification Number 11/MRB/2022 dated 11.10.2022 by considering his representation dated

07.07.2023.

¶2By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admissions itself.

¶3The petitioner is a physically challenged person having 50% permanent disability in both his legs. He is a qualified MBBS Doctor and he registered himself under Tamil Nadu Medical Council vide Registration No. 175440. He is presently practicing modern medicine. The 3rd respondent board vide notification, dated 11.10.2022 called for the applications to fill up the existing vacancies for Assistant Surgeon. The differently abled persons with disabilitly of 40% to 80% were also permitted to participate in the examination. The age criteria has been concessioned for differently abled candidates to the maximum of 47 years as on 01.07.2022 in the said notification. Though differently abled persons are exempted from writing Tamil language tests, the minimum qualifying marks for differently abled candidates have been fixed as 35 like other general candidates. Hence, the petitioner made a representation on

07.07.2023 to the respondents requesting to reduce the minimum marks for differently abled persons. However, the said representation was not considered. Hence, this writ petition came to be filed.

¶4It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondent to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such non-consideration of the representation made by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking the extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶5It is made clear that without going into the merits of this case, considering the limited time, this Court is inclined to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.07.2023 within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

17.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No gbg To

1.The Secretary, Health, Medical Education, Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.

2.The Director, Directorate of Medical and Health Services, 7th Floor, DMS Buildings, 359, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-6.

3.The Secretary, Medical Services Recruitment Board (MRB), 7th Floor, DMS Buildings, 359, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-6.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

gbg

17.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI S.Venish ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Health, Medical Education, Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-9. 2.The Director, Directorate of Medical and Health Services, 7th Floor, DMS Buildings, 359, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-6. 3.The Secretary, Medical Services Recruitment Board (MRB), 7th Floor, DMS Buildings, 359, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-6. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to fix the minimum marks for differently abled persons against the selection of Assistant Surgeon (General) as per the Notification Number 11/MRB/2022 dated 11.10.2022 by considering his representation dated 07.07.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For R1 & R2 : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhian Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.