VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Vellaiappan v. The Superintending Engineer

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 March 2026
Bench
G.R.Swaminathan, R. Poornima
Case no.
WA(MD) 1153/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA W.A(MD)Nos.1153, 1220, 1227 & 1341 of 2023 W.A(MD)No.1153 of 2023: V.Vellaiappan ... Appellant / 2nd Respondent Vs.

1.The Superintending Engineer, Karur Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB), (Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation), Karur - 639 002.

2.The Chief Engineer / Distribution, Tamil Nadu General and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO), Trichy Region, Thennur, Trichy. ... Respondents 1 & 2/ Petitioners

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, (Controlling Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972), Dindigul. ... 3rd Respondent / 1st Respondent

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act to set aside the order in W.P(MD)No.5134 of 2020 dated 30.01.2023 by allowing this Writ Appeal. For Appellant : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For Respondents : Ms.P.Malini for M/s.Agam Legal for R.1 & R.2 Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate for R.3 W.A(MD)No.1220 of 2023:

1.P.Ramakrishnan

2.S.Jeyapapaul Singh

3.P.Venugopalan

4.A.Subramanian

5.SU.Namachivayan

6.G.Navamani

7.V.Sethuraman

8.K.Ramu

9.K.Chelliah

10.M.Lakshmi ... Appellants / Petitioners 1 to 5, 7, 8, 13, 14 & 15 Vs.

1.The State represented by The Secretary to the Government, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

2.The Commissioner of Labour, Office of the Commissioner of Labour, Chennai – 6.

3.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Formerly TNEB, Rep by its Chairman / Director, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

4.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB), Presently Known as Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Rep by its Secretary, 144 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

5.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Combined Labour Court Complex, Bharathi Ula Salai, Race Course Salai, Madurai – 625 002.

6.The Additional Commissioner of Labour, Appellate Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1st Floor, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ellis Nagar, Madurai – 625 001.

7.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, The Controlling Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Office of Joint Commissioner of Labour, Sengulum Colony, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

8.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, The Appellate Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Sengulum Colony, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

9.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, The Controlling Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Dindigul Collector Office, Chettinaickenpatti, Dindigul – 624 004.

10.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour - Tirunelveli, The Controlling Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Combined Labour Department Office Buildings, Opposite to All India Radio, Konam, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents 1 to 10 / Respondents 1 to 10

11.M.Selvaraj

12.V.Chandran

13.R.Rajamani

14.D.Vellaiammal

15.P.Palammal ... Respondents 11 to 15 / Writ Petitioners 6, 9 to 12

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act to set aside the order in W.P(MD)No.859 of 2022 dated 30.01.2023 by allowing this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate for R.1, R.2, R.5 to R.10 Ms.P.Malini for M/s.Agam Legal for R.3 & R.4 W.A(MD)No.1227 of 2023:

1.R.Muthuirulandi

2.G.Krishnan

3.R.Karunanithi

4.D.Martin Deborus

5.M.Dakhsnamoorthy

6.S.Emalda

7.C.Elongovan

8.K.Subramanian

9.S.Jesudasan

10.M.Sudalai

11.P.Kannan

12.K.Murugan

13.M.Muthukrishnan

14.R.Hariharan

15.K.Vadivel

16.N.Shunmugavelu

17.M.Ganthi

18.R.Ganthi

19.G.Kannan

20.R.Lakshmanan

21.L.Krishnan

22.R.Saivadurai

23.P.Ganesan

24.S.Jeyaprakash

25.R.Dinakaran

26.K.Uthiran

27.M.Govindarajan

28.S.Sarathamani Devi ... Appellants / Petitioners 1, 3, 16, 20 to 23, 26, 28 to 30 & 32 to 48 Vs.

1.The State represented by The Secretary to the Government, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

2.The Commissioner of Labour, Office of the Commissioner of Labour, Chennai – 6.

3.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Formerly TNEB, Rep by its Chairman / Director, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

4.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB), Presently Known as Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Rep by its Secretary, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

5.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Combined Labour Court Complex, Bharathi Ula Salai, Race Course Salai, Madurai – 625 002.

6.The Additional Commissioner of Labour, Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1st Floor, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ellis Nagar, Madurai – 625 001.

7.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, The Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Office of Joint Commissioner of Labour, Sengulum Colony, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

8.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, The Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Sengulum Colony, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

9.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, The Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Dindigul Collector Office, Chettinaickenpatti, Dindigul – 624 004.

10.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour - Tirunelveli, The Controlling Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Combined Labour Department Office Buildings, Opposite to All India Radio, Konam, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents 1 to 10 / Respondents 1 to 10

11.K.Chinnathal

12.S.Ayyam Perumal

13.P.Jesurai

14.M.A.Abdul Jabbar

15.C.Rajan

16.P.Kolappa Pillai

17.P.Ganesan

18.A.Soloman Edwin

19.S.Mutham Perumal

20.E.Gombal

21.R.Pitchai

22.M.Rajagopal

23.A.Muthu

24.T.Pakkirisamy

25.A.John Napoleon

26.R.Perumal

27.S.Ramasamy

28.K.Rajendran

29.K.Poonusamy

30.R.Ramar ... Respondents 11 to 29 / Writ Petitioners 2, 4 to 15, 17 to 19, 24, 25, 27 & 31

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act to set aside the order in W.P(MD)No.21093 of 2021 dated 30.01.2023 by allowing this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate for R.1, R.2, R.5 to R.10 Ms.P.Malini for M/s.Agam Legal for R.3 & R.4 W.A(MD)No.1341 of 2023:

1.V.Vellaiappan

2.K.Rajacholan

3.S.Dhanapal

4.R.Santhanakrishnan

5.T.Ramu

6.P.Ramanujam

7.S.Susairaj

8.M.Vaiyapuri

9.P.Balasundram

10.M.Subramanian

11.P.Anbalagan

12.C.Vincent Cardoge

13.T.Devasahayam

14.A.Picthai

15.K.Antonyraj

16.A.Solaman

17.G.Pappaiah

18.R.Sethu

19.M.Maheswari

20.S.Rethinam

21.R.Jayaraj

22.S.Velayutham

23.G.Srinivasan

24.M.Karunanidhi

25.G.Pandian

26.V.Ayyyavoo

27.S.Nagan

28.A.Ayyasamy

29.S.Nagarajan

30.U.Krishnan

31.A.Damullalam

32.K.Gandhi

33.M.Govindan

34.K.Nagasamy

35.M.Manikkam

36.R.Mahalingam

37.M.Chinnathambi

38.K.Sathaia

39.P.K.Karuppaiah

40.C.Muthusamy

41.K.Muthuramalingam

42.N.Angusamy

43.C.Ganesan

44.R.Muthukrishnan

45.N.Ganesan

46.R.Sekaran

47.M.Ganesan

48.S.Soundaram

49.N.Ragavan

50.R.Gananshanmugam

51.R.Ambigai Sundaram

52.V.Gowri

53.B.Balu

54.M.Sumathi

55.V.Mariammal

56.V.Sethuraman

57.M.Abdul Hameed

58.M.Natrajan

59.P.Kuppusamy

60.K.Palani

61.V.Thiruvettai

62.P.R.Suriya Kumar

63.S.Thangapandi

64.V.Ganesan

65.S.Velusamy

66.P.Chinnamuthu ... Appellants / Petitioners 1, 2, 11, 13 to 15, 17, 18, 20 to 30, 32, 33, 35, 36, 49 to 56, 58, 60, 61, 63 to 67, 69, 70, 72 to 79, 82, 85 to 94, 97, 99, 101, 107, 110 & Vs.

1.The State represented by The Secretary to the Government, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

2.The Commissioner of Labour, Office of the Commissioner of Labour, Chennai – 6.

3.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Formerly TNEB, Rep by its Chairman / Director, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

4.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB), Presently Known as Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Rep by its Secretary, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

5.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Combined Labour Court Complex, Bharathi Ula Salai, Race Course Salai, Madurai – 625 002.

6.The Additional Commissioner of Labour, Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1st Floor, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ellis Nagar, Madurai – 625 001.

7.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, The Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Office of Joint Commissioner of Labour, Sengulum Colony, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

8.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, The Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Sengulum Colony, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

9.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, The Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Dindigul Collector Office, Chettinaickenpatti, Dindigul – 624 004.

10.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour - Tirunelveli, The Controlling Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Combined Labour Department Office Buildings, Opposite to All India Radio, Konam, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents 1 to 10 / Respondents

11.K.Marappan

12.V.Krishnan ooooooooooooooooW.A(MD)No.1153oofo2023

13.P.Nagappan

14.A.Subramanian

15.M.Dhanapackiyam

16.T.Kuppan

17.M.Duraimanickkam

18.M.Chinnan

19.G.Kathirvel

20.A.Ganeshan

21.R.Muthiyan

22.P.Murugaesan

23.M.Thangavel

24.D.Jaganathan

25.P.Marimuthu

26.R.Jayaraman

27.R.Gurusami

28.P.Balachandran

29.R.Arusamy

30.V.Palaniyappan

31.K.Durgaiyandi

32.N.Arasuappan ooooooooooooooooW.A(MD)No.1153oofo2023

33.N.Petchimuthu

34.N.Balan

35.K.Thangaraju

36.S.Sundramurthi

37.K.Gandhi

38.R.Loganathan

39.K.Karuppiah

40.S.Sabasthian

41.N.Solapandiyan

42.M.Rajendran

43.M.Angusamy

44.S.Murugesan

45.S.Sudarsan

46.E.Gangaiyan

47.P.Ramasamy

48.R.R.Govindraj

49.P.Valli

50.S.Nargisjan

51.G.Saroja

52.S.Arumugam

53.V.Murugandi

54.V.V.Kannan

55.P.Raman ... Respondents 11 to 55 / Writ Petitioners 3 to 10, 12, 16, 19, 31, 34, 37 to 48, 57, 59, 62, 68, 71, 80, 81, 83, 84, 95, 96, 98, 100, 102 to 106, 108 & 109

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act to set aside the order in W.P(MD)No.17828 of 2021 dated 30.01.2023 by allowing this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate for R.1, R.2, R.5 to R.10 Ms.P.Malini for M/s.Agam Legal for R.3 & R.4 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides.

2.The appellants herein were employees of TANGEDCO. Contending that their gratuity claims were not honoured, they filed applications before the controlling authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Awards were passed in their favour. Challenging the same, TANGEDCO filed writ petitions before this Court. The learned single Judge vide order dated 30.01.2023 set aside the order passed by the controlling authority and allowed the writ petitions. Assailing the same, these writ appeals have been filed.

3.Paragraphs 6, 8, 9 and 10 of the order of the learned single Judge read as follows: "6. As per the power available under Section 5 of the Act, the State Government has issued G.O.(Ms.).No. 699, Labour and Employment Department, dated

16.03.1983, exempting from the application of Payment of Gratuity Act to the respondent Corporation and the same was confirmed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.75 of 2018. The Division Bench of this Court, vide order dated 27.09.2018, set aside the order passed by the learned single Judge and confirmed the exemption granted to the respondent Corporation and the decision of the Apex Court relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioners is not applicable to the case on hand. Hence, he prayed for appropriate orders.

¶7...

¶8The issue arises in the present writ petitions is whether the person, who receiving the pension, is entitled for gratuity or not. For better appreciation, Section 5 of the said Act reads as follows: Power to exempt "(1) The appropriate Government may, by notification, and subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification, exempt any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop to which this Act applies from the operation of the provisions of this Act if, in the opinion of the appropriate Government, the employees in such establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop are in receipt of gratuity or pensionary benefits not less favourable than the benefits conferred under this Act.

(2) The appropriate Government may, by notification and subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification, exempt any employee or class of employees employed in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop to which this Act applies from the operation of the provisions of this Act, if, in the opinion of the appropriate Government, such employee or class of employees are in receipt of gratuity or pensionary benefits not less favourable than the benefits conferred under this Act.

(3) A notification issued under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) may be issued retrospectively a date not earlier than the date of commencement of this Act, but no such notification shall be issued so as to prejudicially affect the interests of any person. "

¶9A perusal of Section 5 of the Act reveals that the State Government have power to exempt any establishment or any employee for getting gratuity amount, if they received gratuity or pensionary benefits not less than the benefits conferred under this Act. Admittedly, the petitioners are the retired employees of the respondent Corporation and they are also pensioners and already they were paid the death cum retirement gratuity under the Pension Scheme. Apart from that, they have made applications before the Gratuity authority claiming gratuity amount under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The learned single Judge has allowed the writ petition in W.P.(MD).No. 33704 of 2002 filed by the employee of the respondent Corporation claiming gratuity amount under the Act 1972. However, the same was challenged before the Division Bench of this Court and the Division Bench of this Court has set aside the order and held in favour of the respondent Board. Equally, it is also undisputed that the State Government granted exemption to the respondent Corporation from application of the Act vide G.O.(Ms.).No.699,

Labour

and

Employment Department dated 16.03.1983. Further, this Court has perused the order of learned single Judge and the learned single Judge order was modified by the Division Bench of this Court. Hence, as a judicial discipline, this measure was followed by the Division Bench of this Court and not carrying the Apex Court decision. In the Apex Court decision, the establishment, who was arrayed as a party before the Apex Court, was not exempted from payment of gratuity. However, in the present cases, exemption was granted to the respondent Corporation from payment of gratuity in respect of the person, who receiving pension from the respondent Corporation.

¶10In view of the above, the writ petition in W.P.

(MD).No.5134 of 2020 filed by the respondent Corporation is allowed and the other writ petitions in W.P.(MD).Nos.859 of 2022, 17828 of 2021 and 21093 of 2021 filed by the employees of the Corporation are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed."

4.We do not find any error in the approach adopted by the learned single Judge. The Government had specifically exempted the corporation from the applicability of the said Act. Therefore, the controlling authority lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the claim of the employees of TANGEDCO. There is no merit in these writ appeals.

5.These Writ Appeals stand dismissed. No costs.

[G.R.S., J.] [R.P, J.]

10.03.2026

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Secretary to the Government, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

2.The Commissioner of Labour, Office of the Commissioner of Labour, Chennai – 6.

3.The Chairman / Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Formerly TNEB, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

4.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB), Presently Known as Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

5.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Combined Labour Court Complex, Bharathi Ula Salai, Race Course Salai, Madurai – 625 002.

6.The Additional Commissioner of Labour, Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1st Floor, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ellis Nagar, Madurai – 625 001.

7.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, The Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Office of Joint Commissioner of Labour, Sengulum Colony, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

8.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, The Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Sengulum Colony, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

9.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, The Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Dindigul Collector Office, Chettinaickenpatti, Dindigul – 624 004.

10.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour - Tirunelveli, The Controlling Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Combined Labour Department Office Buildings, Opposite to All India Radio, Konam, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND R.POORNIMA

, J.

MGA

10.03.2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.