VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Pugal Perumal v. The Sub Registrar

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 June 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16660/2026

Judgment

ORDER The writ petition is filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip dated 12.06.2026.

¶2Heard Mr.T.Antony Arulraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Rajagopalan, learned Government Standing Counsel, who takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶3The case of the petitioner is that the property comprised in S.No.225/A1, situated at Bodinayakanur Municipal Town, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Periyakulam Registration District, Theni District, measuring an extent of 3 acres and 44 cents was purchased by the grandmother of the petitioner namely Tmt.Pankajavalli, wife of V.N.Jayaprakash along with her co-sisters under a registered sale deed dated 06.05.1970. The said Tmt.Pankajavalli during her life executed a 'Will' dated 11.11.2024 bequeathing her share in the properties in favor of the petitioner by an unregistered 'Will' dated 11.11.2024. Thereafter, she passed away on 01.02.2026. Consequently, as a legatee when the petitioner has sought to appoint a power of attorney for the property vested on the petitioner and a general power of attorney document dated

18.05.2026 was executed constituting his mother Samudram as the power of attorney agent and presented before the Sub Registrar. The same has now been refused by the impugned refusal check slip. The impugned order states that the 'Will' is unregistered and has also not been probated.

¶4The learned Government Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent would submit that in the absence of proof of 'Will' the Sub Register has passed an order.

¶5It is now well settled that neither the registration nor the probate of a Will is mandatory. It is also not the duty of the legatee claiming under the Will to prove its genuineness before the Sub-Registrar. .

¶6In view thereof, the writ petition is allowed on the following terms:- i. The impugned order dated 12.06.2026 shall stand set aside. ii. The petitioner is directed to re-present the document for registration, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of the order, without waiting for the certified copy of the order. iii. Upon such representation, the same shall be registered, if there is no other impediment otherwise. iv. No costs.

18.06.2026 rgm To The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

rgm

18.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 18.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Pugal Perumal ... Petitioner Vs. The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District. ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned refusal slip in TP/280683275/2026 dated 12.06.2026 issued by the respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to register the general power of attorney dated 18.05.2026 executed by the petitioner forthwith and pass such other or further orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondent : Mr.P.Rajagopalan Government Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.