VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sakthi.M v. The Director

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18283/2021

Judgment

ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶2Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. NCC : Yes/No

09.11.2023 Index : Yes/No

smn2 To

1.The Director, Directorate of School Education, D.P.I. Campus , College Road, Chennai.

2.The Member Secretary, Department of Government Examination, State Board of School Examination (Hr. Sec) Tamil Nadu, Chennai.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai Road, Palace Theatre Opposite, Trichy. W.P.(MD)No.18283oofo2021 N.ANANDoVENKATESH,ooJ. smn2 W.P.(MD)oNo.18283oofo2021 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15115oando15116oofo2021

09.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15115 and 15116 of 2021 M.Sakthi .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Director, Directorate of School Education, D.P.I. Campus , College Road, Chennai. 2.The Member Secretary, Department of Government Examination, State Board of School Examination (Hr. Sec) Tamil Nadu, Chennai. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai Road, Palace Theatre Opposite, Trichy. 4.The Chairman, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Groups, Thuraiyur Road, Perambalur. 5.The Principal, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Matric Hr. Sec. School, Cholarajapuram, Woraiyur, Trichy. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to add internal marks for all subjects for the petitioner by receiving the same from the 5th respondent while processing the application dated 04.10.2021 of the petitioner for revaluation / retotalling of the marks issued by the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate For R4 and R5 : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.