- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 July 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 17239/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioner has filed an application on 18.04.2023 for survey of his house property in S.No.61, Door No.150, Managiri Bit I, Yerikaraithottam, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai and filed this writ petition that his application has not been considered by the respondents so far.
2.Mr.G.V.Vairam
Santhosh,
learned
Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents submits that the application submitted by the petitioner is under consideration and it would be considered within a period of four weeks.
3.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conduct a survey of the petitioner's house property within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
18.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. vrn To
1.The District Collector, Madurai District.
2.The Tahsildar, North Taluk, Madurai -20.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. vrn WP(MD).No.17239 of 2023
18.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI WP(MD).No.17239 of 2023 Hari Vignesh ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Tahsildar, North Taluk, Madurai -20. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to measure the petitioner's house property in Door No.150, comprised in to an extent of 3539 sq.ft now situate in Block No.6, Managiri Bit I, Yerikaraithottam, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District on the basis of the representation of the petitioner, dated 18.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vellaichamy For R1 to R3 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.