- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 August 2023
- Bench
- S.S. Sundar, D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 20396/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.] Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel, takes notice for the second respondent – Bank.
¶2With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.
¶3This writ petition is filed challenging the notice dated
05.05.2023, issued by the second respondent – Bank.
¶4The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition as if the first respondent is the principal borrower and the loan was borrowed in relation to the commercial transaction between him and the first respondent.
¶5This Court is unable to accept the contentions of the petitioner. It is open to the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal challenging the possession notice, dated 10.08.2023, stated to have been issued by the second respondent – Bank.
¶6With the liberty so preserved to the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[S.S.S.R., J.] [D.B.C., J.]
22.08.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk S.S.SUNDAR , J . and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) No.16840 of 2023
22.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.(MD) No.16840 of 2023 M/s.Delta Tractors & Farm Equipment Firm rep.by its Managing Partner S.Dheepan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Branch Manager M/s.Escorts Kubota Limited (Formerly Escorts Limited) Trichy Branch 2.The Authorized Officer State Bank of India SME Branch Commercial Complex Kamala Subramaniam Arcade Thanjavur ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records and quash the same of impugned notice dated 05.05.2023 u/s.13(2) of SARFASI Act. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Balasubramanian For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.