- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 19217/2020
Judgment
O R D E R The Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
¶2Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
09.10.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
09.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH G.Ramasamy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The General Manager, Canara Bank, East Veli Street, Madurai-1. 2.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, No.23, New Agraharam, Palani Road, Dindigul, Dindigul-624 001. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to permit to redeem the mortgaged jewels pledged by the petitioner under jewel loan caption dated 05.06.2020 and 07.10.2020 in the 2nd respondent bank on settlement of jewel loan amount. For Petitioner : Mr.Raja.Karthikeyan For R-2 : Mr.N.Dilipkumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.