Gokila v. The District Collector

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.

¶2The petitioner is the wife of the second respondent. The petitioner wants disciplinary action to be taken against the second respondent.

¶3The issue between the petitioner and the second respondent is purely private. If the second respondent had committed any offence, it is always open to the petitioner to prosecute the second respondent. If the second respondent is convicted, certainly it will have a bearing on his career. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, I am of the view that case for issuance of direction has not been made out. This writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

21.06.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.19126 OF 2020 To: The District Collector, District Collectorate Campus, Virudhunagar District. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.19126 OF 2020 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.19126 of 2020

21.06.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.19126 OF 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.19126 of 2020 Gokila ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate Campus, Virudhunagar District. 2. Ashok Kumar ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.10.2020 seeking disciplinary action against the 2nd respondent within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Anandakumar For R-1 : Mr.G.Suriyananth, Additional Government Pleader. For R-2 : Mr.S.Ramanathan * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.19126 OF 2020