VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Gomagan.N v. The State of Tamil Nadu

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 July 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18427/2021

Judgment

ORDER The writ petitioner has instructed his counsel to withdraw this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has circulated a letter in this connection. He also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2Hence, permission is granted and accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

13.07.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

2.The State Project Director, Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, Chennai – 6.

3.The Chief Educational Officer cum District Project Co-ordinator, Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, Integrated School Education, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

13.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.15214 and 15215 of 2021 N.Gomagan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9. 2.The State Project Director, Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, Chennai – 6. 3.The Chief Educational Officer cum District Project Co-ordinator, Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, Integrated School Education, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.150/O.Pa.Ka/2020 dated 09.09.2021 on the file of the Respondent No.3 and quash the same as illegal insofar as insisting the petitioner to open new account in Canara Bank, Ramanathapuram. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam, Government Advocate.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.