- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 July 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 13181/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
¶1Santhosh,
¶2Valarmathi, ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.2&3
Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Elayirampannai Police Station, Elayirampannai, Virudhunagar District, In Crime No.103/2023.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Prabha.S, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.Manikandan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.103/2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused No.2 & 3, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 9(B)(1)(a) of Indian Explosive Act, in Crime No.103 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that on usual inspection at Sri Sai Sankar Fire Works situated at Karisalpatti, Virudhunagar District, the officials has found Red Jaint Fire Crackers which was banned by the Government of Tamil Nadu. On confession of the Manager of the said company one Vadivel, the present complaint has been lodge.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police submitted that these petitioners also partners along with the first accused.
¶5But the counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are only labours under the first accused. They have also produced their aadhar card, which shows that they belonged to Krishnahiri area.
6.Perusal of CD file does not indicate recovery of any partnership deed during the course of investigation.
¶7Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
¶8Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearnce, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sattur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall co-operate with the respondent police to complete the process of investigation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
¶9The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/-
19/07/2023
/ TRUE COPY /
/07/2023
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023. tm TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, SATTUR. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT @ SRIVILLIPUTHUR.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ELAYIRAMPANNAI POLICE STATION, ELAYIRAMPANNAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.PRABHA.S Advocate SR.No.11032 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13181 of 2023 Date :19/07/2023 RK/BUC (28/07/2023) 4P /6 C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.