VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Daniel.P v. The District Collector

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18530/2021

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.10.2021 and consequently direct the second Respondent to ensure the just and fair election of the fifth Respondent in accordance with FORM-VI of the said society after fresh notification.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the election was already conducted on

10.10.2021 and Form-VII was also submitted before the Registrar.

¶3Recording the above, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

09.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To

1.The District Collector Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Registrar (Sangam) Palace Road, Mahal, Madurai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. RDO, Vellaripatty, Madurai.

4.The Thasildhar South Zonal Office, Madurai.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg

09.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).No.15303 of 2021 P.Daniel ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Registrar (Sangam) Palace Road, Mahal, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. RDO, Vellaripatty, Madurai. 4.The Thasildhar South Zonal Office, Madurai. 5.Madurai Keelasandhapettai Nadar Uravinmurai, No.5, Kondi Tholu North Street, Keelasandhapettai, Madurai. Represented through the Election Committee. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st to 4th respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.10.2021 and further direct the 2nd Respondent to ensure the just and fair election of 5th Respondent in accordance with FORM-VI of the said society after fresh notification. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus For R-1 to R-4 : Ms.S.Jeyapriya, Government Advocate For R-5 : Mr.Ponkarthikeyan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.