Bhaskar.S v. The Sub-Registrar

ORDER It is informed that the request of the petitioner has been considered by the first respondent by passing orders dated 03.04.2022. Hence, nothing survives for consideration.

¶2Considering the fact that the petitioner's request has been considered, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

03.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To The Sub-Registrar, O/o. Sub-Registrar Office, Batalagundu, Dindigul District.

P.T.ASHA, J. abr Dated: 03.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA S.Bhaskar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Sub-Registrar, O/o. Sub-Registrar Office, Batalagundu, Dindigul District. 2.S.Saravanadevi .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records from the 1st respondent in proceedings No.RFL/Batalagundu/15/2021 dated 27.09.2021 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent to register the settlement deed document presented by the petitioner on 27.09.2021 without insisting original partition deed vide D.No.1699/1973 on the file of SRO, Batalagundu within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran For R1 : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate