- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1490/2023
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner wanted the survey to be conducted. This Court disposed of the petitioner's writ petition on 23.01.2023. Contending that the order has not been complied with, this contempt petition came to be filed.
¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the objections raised by the adjacent land owners have been sustained and rejection order has been passed on 12.06.2023. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law.
¶3This contempt petition is closed accordingly.
09.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No NCC : Yes / No MGA
To
1.The Tahsildar, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA in W.P(MD)No.1198 of 2023
09.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in W.P(MD)No.1198 of 2023 Mariappan ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1.Saravanan, Tahsildar, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. 2.P.Manimozhi, Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District. ... Contemnors / Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnors / Respondents for their willful disobedience of the order of the Court in W.P(MD)No.1198 of 2023 dated 23.01.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.