Palanivel v. The Commissioner

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has not been coined in a proper manner and therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. No costs.

24.07.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Commissioner, Land Administration Department, 2nd Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 05.

¶2The District Collector, Collectorate, Thanjavur,

¶3Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Thanjavur District 614 602.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

¶4The Tasildhar, O/o. Pattukkottai Taluk Office,

24.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Palanivel ... Petitioner versus 1. The Commissioner, Land Administration Department, 2nd Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 05. 2. The District Collector, Collectorate, Thanjavur, 3. Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Thanjavur District 614 602. 4. The Tasildhar, O/o. Pattukkottai Taluk Office, 5. V.Veerasenan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to give necessary instructions to the 5th respondent as not to interfere in the petitioner's peaceful possession over the property situated in Survey No.22/14, New Survey No.22/14A, 22/14B Ponnavarayankottai Village, Pattukkottai Taluk, Thanjavur District, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2023, within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Devarajmahesh For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader