VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Arumugapandi v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 July 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 13309/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.13309 of 2023 Arumugapandi ... Petitioner/Accused No.2

Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Thoothukudi District Crime No.226/2023. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Prabu.M, Advocate

For Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.226 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 448, 294(b), 323, 506(ii) I.P.C, in Crime No.226 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 11.07.2023 at about 10.00a.m., the first accused came to the vegetable shop run by the defacto complainant and picked up quarrel with him and assaulted him. Later, the first accused gathered his village people and trespassed into the shop of the defacto complainant and caused damages to the articles in the shop. Hence, the complaint has been registered against five persons.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. As per FIR, only four unknown persons trespassed into the shop and committed the offence.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner along with other accused had trespassed, assaulted and caused damages to the articles in the shop. The petitioner is having six previous cases, among which, one case was registered for the offence under Section 302 IPC. Hence, prays to dismiss the petition.

5.Though there is no specific overt act attributed against the petitioner, considering the fact that the petitioner is having six previous cases and bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

sd/-

21/07/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/07/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. pnm TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOVILPATTI EAST POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,

MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13309 of 2023 Date :21/07/2023 SS/MR/29/07/2023/3P/3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.