- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 July 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 13310/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.13310 of 2023
¶1Alamelu Mangammal
¶2Gothai Andal
¶3Nagaraj
¶4Shengamalathayar
¶5Subburaj
... Petitioners/Accused(Rank not known)
Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Soolakarai Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.Not known of 2023.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Ramasamy S, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Manikandan,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. of 2023 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the defacto complainant is the daughter of first petitioner, sister of second and fourth petitioners. By suppressing the preliminary decree obtained by the petitioners in O.S.No.227 of 1996, on the file of Sub Court, Virudhunagar, the defacto complainant has executed a settlement deed in favour of her son, namely Govindarajan and when the same was brought to the knowledge of the petitioners, they filed I.A.No.1 of 2021 for executing the above said preliminary decree. Pending the above said process, the present complaint has been registered against the petitioners.
2.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that based on the reference made by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar in Crl.M.P.No.6333 of 2023 under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C, enquiry is underway.
3.Since, enquiry is pending against the petitioners, the question of anticipatory bail does not arise. Let the petitioners produce all the documents available with them. The said enquiry should be concluded by the respondent within a period of 15 days, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioners finds any trouble in future, they can work out their remedy through appropriate proceedings.
4.Accordingly,othisoCriminaloOriginaloPetitionoisodisposedoof. oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sd/- oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 21/07/2023 ooooooooooooooo /oTRUEoCOPYo/ oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo /07/2023 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Sub-AssistantoRegistraro(C.S.) ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo MaduraioBenchoofoMadrasoHighoCourt, oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Maduraio-o625o023.o pnm TO 1oooTHEoINSPECTORoOFoPOLICE SOOLAKARAIoPOLICEoSTATION, VIRUDHUNAGARoDISTRICT. 2oooTHEoADDITIONALoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR, ooo MADURAIoBENCHoOFoMADRASoHIGHoCOURT, ooo MADURAI.o COPYoTO: THEoSUBORDINATEoJUDGE,oVIRUDHUNAGARoDISTRICT. +1oCCotooM/s.S.RAMASAMY,oAdvocateo(oSR-11095[I]odatedo21/07/2023o) ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooCRLoOP(MD)oNo.13310oofo2023 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:21/07/2023 SS/BUC/29/07/2023/3P/5Co MaduraioBenchoofoMadrasoHighoCourtoisoissuingocertifiedoocopiesoinothisoformatofromo17/07/2023ohttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.