- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1657/2018
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.12.2023 ssb NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To The Executive Officer, Kariapatty Town Panchayat, Virudhunagar District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb
04.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD).No.1756 of 2018 R.Raju ... Petitioner versus 1.The Executive Officer, Kariapatty Town Panchayat, Virudhunagar District. 2.Deivasigamani, Contractor, Corner Road, Pandian Nagar, Kariyapatty, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent made in Na.Ka.No.156/2017 dated 18.01.2018 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to include Technical Bid of the petitioner made in Tender Work in Roc.No.156/2017 dated 10.12.2017 under Capital Grant Fund Scheme 2017-18 and open the price Bid. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sundareshan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.