- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 2316/2018
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 27.11.2023 to the Registrar (Judicial), for withdrawing this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2Based on the letter dated 27.11.2023, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
29.11.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. Note : Issue order copy on 30.11.2023 To
¶1The General Manager, District Industries Centre, Tuticorin District.
¶2Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ettayapuram, Tuticorin District.
¶3The Sub Registrar, Ottapidaram, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
29.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.22751 of 2023 Shri Venkateswaran Carbides, Rep. by its Proprietor, T.Subramanian, Pasuvanthanai Road, Vittiliapuram, K.Duraisamypuram (P.O.), Ottapidaram Taluk, V.O.C. District. ... Petitioner versus 1. The General Manager, District Industries Centre, Tuticorin District. 2. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ettayapuram, Tuticorin District. 3. The Sub Registrar, Ottapidaram, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 03.10.2017 and the 3rd respondent dated 24.12.2014 and to remove the attachment made as per the request of the 2nd respondent by the third respondent with respect to the Survey No.316/1B and No.316/1A, Meenakshipuram Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District measuring 3 acres and 5 cents. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vadivelu For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.