VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

C.Kuppu, v. The Chairman/Managing Director

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 April 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9392/2016

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed to quash the punishment orders with consequential relief to pay the arrears of increment and grant promotion if any which the petitioner is legally entitled.

¶2The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner had attained superannuation on 30.04.2020. Thereafter, the terminal benefits were paid to the petitioner through proceedings dated

05.07.2021. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication.

¶3Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

25.04.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The Chairman/Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, No.144, N.P.K.R.R. Maaligai, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.

2.The Chief Engineer/Distribution, Trichy Region, Trichy-17.

3.The Superintending Engineer, Pudukottai Electricity Distribution Circle, Pudhukottai.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

25.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.7448 and 7449of 2016 C.Kuppu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman/Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, No.144, N.P.K.R.R. Maaligai, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 2.The Chief Engineer/Distribution, Trichy Region, Trichy-17. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Pudukottai Electricity Distribution Circle, Pudhukottai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records relevant to the Order No.228 (Board Standing Rule (Permanent) dated 17.11.2015 passed by the first respondent by modifying the order of the second respondent in Ku.AA.No.1147/27/NiPi.Pi./Pi.1/2011 dated 11.03.2011 by confirming the order of the third respondent in Ku.AA.No. 10378/260/NiPi1/U3/08-2, dated 18.09.2008 and quash the same as illegal, improper, unreasonable and principles of natural justice and thereby direct the respondents to pay the arrears of increment and due promotion if any which the petitioner is legally entitled. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs.M.Parameswari Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.