- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 3099/2018
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
04.12.2023 ssb NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To The Commissioner, Periyakulam Municipality Periyakulam, Theni District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb
04.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD).Nos.3248 and 3249 of 2019 Duraipandi ... Petitioner versus The Commissioner, Periyakulam Municipality Periyakulam, Theni District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned tender notice in Na.Ka.No.218/2018/A2 dated 02.02.2018 and quash the same insofar as 1st item therein is concerned and consequently, direct the respondent herein to continue the lease granted in favour of the petitioner till 31.03.2020 by receiving the dues and further lease amount from the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Appadurai For Respondents : Mr.M.Karuppasamypandian
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.