VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Eswaran v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 November 2023
Bench
The Chief Justice, K.K. Ramakrishnan
Case no.
WP(MD) 19859/2022

Judgment

ORDER [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The CHIEF JUSTICE] We have heard Mr.D.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.T.Amjad Khan, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No.1 and Mr.K.Hema Karthikeyan, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents 3 to 9 have encroached upon the public streets and have erected stalls. The same is illegal.

3.The learned Advocate for the respondent No.2 Corporation submits that the Corporation has issued licenses to these persons to run petty shops. They are not on the road but are adjacent to the road.

4.If the Corporation issued licenses, the occupation of the respondents 3 to 9 cannot be said to be unauthorised or illegal. They are running petty shops under the license issued by the Corporation. At the same time, the Corporation is also required to issue the license on the premises that is unobjectionable and it would oversee that the said shops are not on the road.

¶5The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

[S.V.G., CJ.] [K.K.R.K, J.]

28.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No

RR To

¶1The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul..

¶2The Corporation Commissioner, Palani, Dindigul District.. W.P.(MD) No.19859 of 2022 THEoHON'BLEoTHEoCHIEFoJUSTICE and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,ooJ. RR W.P.(MD)No.19859oofo2022

28.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.(MD) No.19859 of 2022 Eswaran, ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.. 2. The Corporation Commissioner, Palani, Dindigul District.. 3. Muthuramalingam, 4. Thowbig, 5. Mahesh, 6. Pandi, 7. Samsudeen, 8. Abudhahir, 9. Ponraj, ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the encroachment of illegal construction made by the respondents 3 to 9 in Thiruvalluvar Road (Ulavarsanthai Road), Palani, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 10.05.2022 within a time frame. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan for R1 Government Advocate Mr.K.Hema Karthikeyan for R2 No appearance for R3 to R9

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.