VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Balasubramani v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 August 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 13520/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 11/08/2023 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

1.V.Balasubramani

2.Balathandayutham

3.Karthik

4.Parameswaran ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4

Vs The State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No.213 of 2023. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.ALAGUMANI,

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.SURESH KUMAR, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.213 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 4, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.213 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that there is some land dispute between the 1st petitioner and the defacto complainant, for which, a suit in O.S.No.1 of 2018 is pending before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodaikanal. Due to said motive, the petitioners herein abused and attacked the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Further, injured is discharged from the hospital.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioners are having two previous cases at their credit.

¶5The learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that all the above said cases are registered regarding land issue.

¶6Considering the fact and circumstances of this case and also considering the bad antecedent of these petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/-

11/08/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/09/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. INDU TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 3 DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KODAIKANAL ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13520 of 2023 Date :11/08/2023 SA/VRS/SAR. /07.09.2023/3P/4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.