- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18931/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement so made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
09.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To
1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvadanai Panchayat Union, Thiruvadanai Post, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
09.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).No.15749 of 2021 S.Lawrence ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvadanai Panchayat Union, Thiruvadanai Post, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to construct a permanent bridge in public road at Nagarithan Village, Pullur Circle, Thiruvadanai Union, Ramanthapuram under the scheme of Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) and consider the petitioner's representation dated 26-08-2021. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Rajeswari For Respondents : Ms.S.Jeyapriya, Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.