- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 August 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 13558/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01/08/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN G.Karuppasamy ... Petitioner / Sole Accused Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Watrap Police Station, Virudhunagar District, Crime No.122 of 2023. ... Respondent / Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.T.Thirumurugan, Advocate for M/S.Kalidass.A, Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan
Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.122 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Sole Accused herein, who was arrested on 16.06.2023 for the alleged offence under Sections 9(f) r/w Section 10 of POCSO Act 2012 in Crime No.122 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant lodged a complaint stating that on 15.06.2023, the victim girl went to the school and did not return to the house. It is informed that the petitioner misbehaved with her. On the basis of the complaint, a case has been registered. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. Seeking bail this petition came to be registered.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the ground that the because of motive between the victim's relatives and this petitioner, a false complaint has been given.
¶4With regard to the allegations, the investigation officer was also directed to appear before this Court and he states that some two years prior to the occurrence, the petitioner had similarly misbehaved with one girl. That matter was compromised by the villager elders and he was also warned by the villagers. This is the second occurrence. Noting the behaviour of the petitioner, the villagers made the complaint.
¶5Considering the above said information that has been furnished by the respondent, this Court is not inclined to grant relief to the petitioner. Accordingly this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.
sd/-
01/08/2023
/ TRUE COPY /
/08/2023
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023. pnn TO
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WATRAP POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
2.THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, VIRUDHUNAGAR. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.A.KALIDASS, Advocate ( SR-11656[I] dated 02/08/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13558 of 2023 Date :01/08/2023
RK/BUC/SAR-4(16/08/2023) 4P / 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.