VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

C.Selvaraj, v. The District Registrar,

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 September 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4945/2018

Judgment

ORDER There is no representation on the side of the petitioner on 03.08.2023. The matter was adjourned to 10.08.2023 under the caption ''For Dismissal''. Even on the said date, there was no representation. Again it was posted on

28.08.2023. Thereafter, there was no representation on 28.08.2023 itself. Hence, the matter is posted under the caption "for dismissal" today. Even today there is no representation on the side of the petitioner.

¶2Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

04.09.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The District Registrar, O/o. The District Registrar of Industrial Co-operative Societies, District Industries Centre, Madurai.

2.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu Industrial Co-operative Bank Limited, (TAICO Bank), Madurai, 254, 1st Floor, Goods Shed Street, Madurai – 01.

4.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Madurai Corporation Branch, Madurai Corporation, Madurai – 2.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

04.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.4925 and 4926 of 2018 C.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar, O/o. The District Registrar of Industrial Co-operative Societies, District Industries Centre, Madurai. 2.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu Industrial Co-operative Bank Limited, (TAICO Bank), Madurai, 254, 1st Floor, Goods Shed Street, Madurai – 01. 3.The Regional Manager, Canara Bank, Palayakuyavarpalayam Road, Balarengapuram, Madurai – 01. 4.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Madurai Corporation Branch, Madurai Corporation, Madurai – 2. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertain to the impugned order vide E.P.No.139/2014-2015 dated 19.10.2016 passed by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the fourth respondent to return the withheld amount of Rs.1,86,076/- of Account No.304110125157, and as well as the previous deducted amount of the petitioner's pension, to him and stop further deducting Rs.3,000/- per month from the petitioner's pension. For Petitioner : No Appearance For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.M.Ramesh, Government Advocate. For R-3 and R-4 : Mr.C.Karthick

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.