Pandimeenal v. The District Collector

ORDER The order passed by this Court does not warrant any review since the petitioner had been given liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

¶2With this liberty to the petitioner, this Review Application is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. [G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.]

21.08.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC :Yes/No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Divisional Office, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District. G.R.SWAMINATHAN,oJ oandoo B.PUGALENDHI,oJ. MGA REV.APLW(MD)No.132oofo2023 in W.P(MD)No.13536oofo2023

21.08.2023 4/4https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI REV.APLW(MD)No.132 of 2023 in W.P(MD)No.13536 of 2023 Pandimeenal ... Petitioner/ Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Divisional Office, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents/ Respondents PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code to review the order made in W.P(MD)No.13536 of 2023 dated 13.06.2023 on the file of this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Karthigaivel For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R.1 & R.2