Sureshkumar v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Panagudi

ORDER The present petition has been filed by the 1st accused in Cr.No.493 of 2026, on the file of the 1st respondent police, seeking to quash the notice issued by learned Judicial Magistrate Valliyoor on 15.06.2026, directing the petitioner to appear and offer his explanation for cancellation of bail filed by the Investigation Agency in Crl.M.P.No.467 of 2026.

¶2The petitioner was enlarged on bail by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, in Crl.M.P.No.1758 of 2026 on 29.04.2026, with the condition that he should report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of one month.

¶3The petitioner herein had appeared before the respondent police between 01.05.2026 to 08.05.2026, 12.05.2026 and 13.05.2026. Thereafter, the petitioner had been appeared before the respondent police and complied with the condition imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. Therefore, the respondent police have filed Crl.M.P.No.467 of 2026 for cancellation of bail.

¶4According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the condition imposed by the trial Court was modified by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.10191 of 2026 dated 05.06.2026. As per the modified order, the petitioner was directed to appear before the respondent police every Saturday on

10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks.

¶5According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, when the condition imposed by the trial Court has been regularized, the Investigating Agency cannot approach the concerned Court, seeking cancellation of bail on the ground that condition imposed in the bail order have not been complied with.

¶6Per contra, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police pointed out that the petitioner has to comply with the orders of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. It was modified by this Court on 05.06.2026. He further submits that the order of this Court dated 05.06.2026 is also not complied with so far.

¶7In view of the above said facts, the petitioner is directed to appear before the concerned Court in pursuance to the notice issued by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.467 of 2026 dated 15.06.2026 and offer his explanation.

¶8This Court does not find any reason to quash the said notice issued by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.467 of 2026 dated 15.06.2026. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.07.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rgm To: The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police station, Tirunelveli District, Crime no.493/2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR

, J.

rgm Crl.O.P(MD).No.12915 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.12629 of 2026

03.07.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD).No.12915 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.12629 of 2026 Sureshkumar ... Petitioner Vs State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep By Inspector Of Police, Panagudi Police station, Tirunelveli District, Crime no.493/2026. ... Respondent PRAYER: To call for the records pertaining to the impugned summons issued by the learned Judicial magistrate, valliyoor in Crl.M.P.No.467 of 2026 dated 15.06.2026 and quash the same as illegal and pass such further or any other orders. For petitioner : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)