- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 July 2023
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 5325/2018
Judgment
ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
26.07.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No aav To
¶1The Sub Divisional Magistrate Sub Collecotr, Paramakudi Division Paramakudi Ramanathapuram District
¶2The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai.
P.DHANABAL, J. aav W.P(MD)No.5325 of 2018
26.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :26.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.5325 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD) No.5275 of 2018 Palraj ... Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Sub Collecotr, Paramakudi Division Paramakudi Ramanathapuram District 2. Alagarsamy 3. Velusamy 4. Vijayaragavan 5. Kasthuri ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.A2/7400/2016 dated 09.03.2015 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Deenadhayalan For R1 : Mr. R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 to R4 : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.