VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Marriappan v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 March 2023
Bench
S Justice R. Tharaniauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 1073/2021

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice R. Tharani

Judgment

ORDER This petition is filed to quash the first Information Report in Crime No. 1192 of 2020.

2.On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that the FIR was already closed as 'mistake of fact'.

3.An online verification of the CCTNS portal reveals that the case was closed as 'mistake of fact'.

4.In view of the submission made by the petitioner and since FIR was already closed, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

10.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Mrn To

1.The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R. THARANI,J. Mrn

10.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.THARANI and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.492 of 2021 Marriappan ...Petitioner Vs 1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 2.Navaneetha Krishnan ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying this Court to call for the records and quash the first Information Report in Crime No.1192 of 2020 registered for offences under Section 294(b), 420, and 506(ii) of IPC on the file of the Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Thoothukudi District as against this petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Arun Kumar For 1st Respondent : Mrs.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For 2nd Respondent : Mr.S.Ramasamy

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.