VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Murugan, S/O.Surulivel v. The Managing Director

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 December 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5806/2018

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition with a grievance as against the third respondent that he is doing illegal Cable TV business in Door No. 164/7, Ward No.8, Alagarsamy Street, Gudalur, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

2.When the writ petition is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3.Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 & 2 submitted that both the petitioner and the third respondent were issued with license as Local Cable Operators of the Arasu Cable TV. She further submitted that the third respondent is no more and that the petitioner has migrated to private MSO network.

4.The petitioner has filed this writ petition for taking action as against the third respondent. Since it is reported by the respondents 1 & 2 that the third respondent is no more, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Index :

20.12.2023 Internet : gk

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

20.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Murugan .. Petitioner v. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Marshal Road, Egmore, Chennai. 2.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Theni District. 3.N.Pandiarajan .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to take appropriate action against the third respondent, who is doing illegal cable TV business in Door No.164/7, Ward No.8, Alagarsamy Street, Gudalur, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 28.01.2018. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.J.R.Annie Abinaya, Standing Counsel for R.1, R.2 Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan for R.3 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.