VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Selvam Marketing v. Sivasakthi Kala

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 October 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 17524/2023

Judgment

O RDER

This criminal original petition has been filed to set aside the order, dated

24.04.2023 made in Crl.M.P.No.1182 of 2023 in C.C.No.230 of 2016 pending on the file of the Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Thoothukudi, in respect of denial of cross examination of PW-2.

2.Being not satisfied over the dismissal of a portion of the relief passed by the Fast Tract Court (Magisterial Level), Thoothukudi, in Crl.M.P.No.1182 of 2023 in C.C.No.230 of 2016, dated 24.04.2023, this petition has been filed. Originally the application was filed by the petitioner to recall PW1 to PW4 for the purpose of further cross examination. That was considered on merits and in respect of PW2 it was dismissed, on the ground that he would be transferred to some other place. This Court is not in position to understand the above said observation. Whether concerned witness has been transferred or not, he has already spoken about the events during the chief examination, so he is only person competent to speak about the facts, during the cross examination. Without cross examination of PW2, the fair justice may not be possible.

3.On that sole ground, the impugned order, dated 24.04.2023 made in Crl.M.P.No.1182 of 2023 in C.C.No.230 of 2016 pending on the file of the Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Thoothukudi, in respect of denial of cross examination of PW-2, is hereby set aside and this criminal original petition is allowed with following stringent conditions. 1) The petitioner must deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as cost to the witnesses PW2 to the credit of C.C.No.230 of 2016, before the trial Court, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶1On such deposit, the trial Court is directed to recall the witness P.W.2 for cross examination by fixing a particular date. On that date, the petitioner must cross examine the witness without fail. If any failure is noticed, then the further right to cross examine the witness will be forfeited.

¶2Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Speaking : Yes / No

03.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No TM To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Thoothukudi.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. TM Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17524 of 2023

03.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17524 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.13919 of 2023 1.M/s.Selvam Marketting, Represented by its Proprietor, Mr.Kasirajan 2.Mr.Kasirajan Proprietor, Selvam Marketting, 135, V.E.Road, Thoothukudi. ... Petitioner / Petitioner / Accused Vs. Ms.Sivasakthi Kala, Represented through her Power of Attorney, Mr.Ganesan, Door. No.4/183/4, Muthammal Colony 2nd Street Extension, Thoothukudi. ...Respondent / Respondent / Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 24.04.2023 made in Crl. Mp. No. 1182 of 2023 in C.C. No.230 of 2016 pending on the file of the Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Thoothukudi in respect of denial of cross examination of PW-2 and set aside the same. For Petitioner :Mr.P.Selvakamatchi

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.