VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Murugan v. The Inspector of Police

PARTLY ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 July 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 13676/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

1.Murugan

2.Adaikkalam

3.Muniyandi ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Nagudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (In Crime No.149 of 2023)

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.R.PRASANNA, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.NAMBISELVAN

Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.149 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners / Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 379 of IPC read with Section 21(1), 21(2) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.149 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 19.07.2023 at about 5.30 a.m., the petitioner were illegally transported 3/4 unit (1/4 unit each) of river sand in bullock carts. Hence the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. They have been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, seek for the relief of anticipatory bail.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners 1 and 2 / Accused Nos.1 and 2 are not having any previous case, but the third petitioner herein / Accused No.3 is having one previous case in Crime No.604 of 2020, for the similar offence.

¶5Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that no previous case has been pending against the petitioners 1 and 2, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 1 and 2 with certain conditions and this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed in so far as the third petitioner is concerned.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed on condition that the petitioners 1 and 2 shall deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) to the credit of Cr.No.149 of 2023 before the trial Court concerned, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court.

¶7On such deposit being made, the petitioners 1 and 2 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners 1 and 2 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners 1 and 2 shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶8The petitioners 1 and 2 shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

26/07/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/07/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. PNN TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARANTHANGI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAGUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to Mr.R.PRASANNA, Advocate SR.No.11330 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13676 of 2023 Date :26/07/2023 SA/MMS/SAR. /02.08.2023/4P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.